"We steal other people's stuff in the
cyber domain," retired General Michael Hayden said at a cybersecurity
conference in Miami Beach.
He then put that in
context: Every country's government is spying on other people and
governments.
America's spies just do it better.
"As a former director of NSA, I like to think we're number one," he said.
Hayden delivered the keynote address at S4X16 conference, which focuses
on how modern hackers are increasingly attacking key industrial
controls at power plants, factories, and municipal services like water
and gas.
The former intelligence official explained
how the United States justifies hacking into computers in foreign
countries -- and how it draws the line on when it's OK.
"We
steal stuff to keep you free and keep you safe," Hayden said. "We do not
steal stuff to make you rich. I can think of only four other countries
who can say that. They all speak English."
Hayden referred to
the United States' four other partners in the "Five Eyes" group of
nations: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom.
For the rest of the world, corporate espionage is a state mission, he said.
"Every other nation-state believes it is legitimate espionage activity
to steal intellectual property," he added.
"And the Chinese are the
poster child for it."
In international politics, this
distinction is a fuzzy line. And it's one of the reasons some
governments are uneasy about America's massive spying operations.
The most stark example came in October last year, when the European
Union's highest court struck down a lucrative, longstanding data-sharing
agreement between the United States and Europe. "Safe Harbor" rules
ensured privacy-conscious Europeans that American companies like
Facebook and Google were guarding their personal information with
"adequate protections."
But the European Court of Justice
invalidated Safe Harbor. It's main reason? Ex-NSA contractor Edward
Snowden exposed the vast extent of the U.S. electronic surveillance.
In an interview, Hayden insisted that the EU's government is wrong. He
said American policy draws a line on when it's OK to hack.
The key difference is how a nation defines "national security," Hayden explained.
"Other nations' definition of national security is a broader one than
what we allow ourselves," he said. "They view economic success as a
national security objective. We don't in terms of state espionage."
0 comments:
Post a Comment
leave a comment